This photo I chosen to analysis was the winner of the World Press Photo awards of 2006.It was taken in a street in Haret Hreik, a neighborhood in Lebanon. The neighborhood had been targeted five weeks and eventually bombed for a campaign against Hezbollah militants. The photo was taken at the time that ceasefire came into force and thousands of Lebanese rush back to their home.

At the first glance, the picture can be really disturbing. In the font, you can see the young and beautiful woman with a model look just wearing their sunglasses and chilling in their shiny red convertible car. It remind people the image from either James Dean in Rebel without a Cause, driving his fast car or some photo spread from Vogue. It was really glamorous. But with the background of people walking around their collapsed home. The contrast just makes the photo really bizarre and disturbing to watch. You cannot help yourself but wonder, what were they doing there?

But there are another story to the picture. In an interview with BBC news, the photographer and the young people in the picture review that actually live there and the car is actually lent form the girlfriend of the guy who is driving the car. The car also played a big role in the war, they took medication to people in these area who refused or cannot leave their home. [Source:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6385969.stm]

It actually provide a quite different side of story, what inspire me is that can we still trust our eyes with just one photo? Nevertheless, this is still a good photo when it can create a huge contrast and discussion.

Denise
10/26/2013 06:27:43 pm

I am surprised by the story behind the red car, as it is being used to help people, to provide medication and rescue people who were stuck in the suburb area. It proves that we cannot really trust what only one photo suggests...

Reply
Hilda
10/26/2013 10:53:41 pm

"Ridiculous!" is my first impression when I saw this photo. People who wearing the beautiful clothes took the photo in front of the collapsed houses sounds very unrespectful to those who lost their home. But there's another story behind the camera really arouse my curiosity. I really want to know who say the truth. :)

Reply
alice
11/2/2013 10:29:29 pm

I had the same reaction as well! I thought they were 'sight-seeing' like you suggested! But then the back story was so much different from what the eyes saw! What happen when only the photo got circulated online? These people will forever be branded as 'heartless' and 'insensitive'!

Reply
Melody
11/23/2013 08:17:44 pm

I thought this photo was "photoshopped" before reading Adrian's passage. The sunglasses and expensive car are easily misunderstood by others. I agree that we should not judge by its looks and should try to understand the background story.

Reply



Leave a Reply.